Simulation centers

A world your center can shape.

Connect facilities, staff, patient histories and assessment objectives within a consistent medical simulation architecture.

Authoring and institutional tooling planned

Discuss your use case Explore the complexes

01 / Simulation architecture

Author the encounter, preserve the person.

The educator tooling roadmap includes patient parameters, objectives, team composition, events and assessment rubrics without requiring Unreal source changes.

Conditions and comorbidities
Event timing and difficulty
Facility and equipment configuration

02 / Simulation architecture

Match immersion to the lesson.

Desktop exploration, XR interaction and specialist feedback should be selected to support the task and evaluated for training relevance.

Desktop and immersive delivery
Hardware-flexible interaction roadmap
Procedure-specific feedback validation

03 / Simulation architecture

Review more than a checklist.

The proposed after-action review connects physiological trends, interventions, communication and resource use.

Action and conversation timeline
Recognition and escalation events
Instructor-defined metrics and rubrics

A clear development boundary

Orthopedics is the initial prototype focus. Specialty scope, advanced physiology, institutional authoring and multiplayer describe the platform direction. No clinical validation or regulatory approval is claimed.

See what exists today

Architecture in context

Follow a complete encounter.

A patient pathway can connect multiple teaching objectives while retaining one history. The complete authoring and assessment interface is planned.

Concept studyIllustrative patient pathway · planned longitudinal continuity

Encounter 01 / Same patient identity

Home / accident

A patient story begins before arrival.

Continuing record: Identity, history and circumstances
Connected team: Patient · relatives

Questions for an evaluation

Scope the model before deployment.

Define the clinical task, available hardware, intended learners and required evidence before deciding which capabilities belong in an institutional evaluation.

01Can multiple clinicians train together?

Mixed human and AI teamwork is part of the design. A synchronized multiplayer experience is planned; the current prototype provides shared-backend foundations rather than a completed multi-user product.

02Can hospitals create custom scenarios?

Educator authoring is planned for patients, conditions, objectives, teams, complications and rubrics. It is intended to reduce reliance on Unreal source changes, but a production authoring interface is not yet available.

03Can AESORYX run privately or on-premises?

Local inference is used in the current prototype. Private cloud and on-premises delivery are deployment directions to assess with institutions; a production deployment package has not been established.

04Is AESORYX clinically validated or a medical device?

No clinical validation, regulatory approval or clinical decision-support status is claimed. The current work is a simulation prototype. Clinical judgment, patient care and regulated device use require separate governance and evidence.

For institutions building what comes next

Build the next generation
of medical simulation.

Start with your specialty, your team and a concrete learning or research objective.

Request a demo Contact AESORYX