Hospitals & healthcare systems

Practice the work between departments.

Explore cross-specialty coordination, clinical handover and operational decisions in an evolving simulated institution.

Institutional evaluation and co-design

Discuss your use case Explore the complexes

01 / Simulation architecture

Patients cross boundaries.

A hip-fracture encounter may involve internal medicine, cardiology, anesthesiology, imaging, pharmacy and rehabilitation. The intended world keeps one patient identity throughout.

Escalation and handover
Mixed clinical and operational workflows
Shared access boundaries and responsibilities

02 / Simulation architecture

Bring a concrete workflow.

A useful evaluation starts with one task, team or care pathway rather than a claim to simulate an entire hospital immediately.

Team composition and learner objectives
Facility and equipment requirements
Operational assumptions and validation scope

03 / Simulation architecture

Plan a suitable deployment.

Cloud, private cloud and on-premises deployment are architecture options to assess with each institution. The current runtime is a local development prototype.

Infrastructure and device requirements
Data governance and security review
Support, integration and evaluation planning

A clear development boundary

Orthopedics is the initial prototype focus. Specialty scope, advanced physiology, institutional authoring and multiplayer describe the platform direction. No clinical validation or regulatory approval is claimed.

See what exists today

Architecture in context

A pathway crosses departments.

An operational setting joins teams, patient locations and resources. Institution-specific workflow models require a defined scope and evaluation.

Concept studyMediVerse · connected facility schematic

Department 01

Emergency

Arrival → assessment

Triage, observation and escalation connect the arrival of a patient with the next appropriate team.

Care teams · assessment spaces · handovers

Illustrative layout. Department workflows are part of the planned specialty complex architecture.

Questions for an evaluation

Scope the model before deployment.

Define the clinical task, available hardware, intended learners and required evidence before deciding which capabilities belong in an institutional evaluation.

01Can multiple clinicians train together?

Mixed human and AI teamwork is part of the design. A synchronized multiplayer experience is planned; the current prototype provides shared-backend foundations rather than a completed multi-user product.

02Can hospitals create custom scenarios?

Educator authoring is planned for patients, conditions, objectives, teams, complications and rubrics. It is intended to reduce reliance on Unreal source changes, but a production authoring interface is not yet available.

03Can AESORYX run privately or on-premises?

Local inference is used in the current prototype. Private cloud and on-premises delivery are deployment directions to assess with institutions; a production deployment package has not been established.

04Is AESORYX clinically validated or a medical device?

No clinical validation, regulatory approval or clinical decision-support status is claimed. The current work is a simulation prototype. Clinical judgment, patient care and regulated device use require separate governance and evidence.

For institutions building what comes next

Build the next generation
of medical simulation.

Start with your specialty, your team and a concrete learning or research objective.

Request a demo Contact AESORYX