EMS, emergency & tactical medicine

Continuity from scene to hospital.

Explore the proposed connection between prehospital assessment, transport, receiving teams and continuing inpatient care.

EMS and emergency complexes planned

Discuss your use case Explore the complexes

01 / Simulation architecture

A handover that carries history.

The roadmap retains the same simulated identity from a scene or home environment into emergency care and subsequent specialty treatment.

Ambulance and emergency-department handover
Trauma and resource coordination
Interprofessional communication

02 / Simulation architecture

Configure the operational setting.

Different environments need explicit assumptions about staffing, available equipment, timing and escalation routes.

Civilian and specialist institutional contexts
Resource constraints and event timing
Team and scenario design

03 / Simulation architecture

Validate for the intended use.

High-stakes workflows require expert review, appropriate evidence and a clear distinction between simulation and real clinical guidance.

Educational objectives and governance
Hardware and interaction checks
Measured human-factors evaluation

A clear development boundary

Orthopedics is the initial prototype focus. Specialty scope, advanced physiology, institutional authoring and multiplayer describe the platform direction. No clinical validation or regulatory approval is claimed.

See what exists today

Architecture in context

From the scene to the next team.

A prehospital encounter should contribute to the same record used by the receiving team. This longitudinal pathway is part of the roadmap.

Concept studyIllustrative patient pathway · planned longitudinal continuity

Encounter 01 / Same patient identity

Home / accident

A patient story begins before arrival.

Continuing record: Identity, history and circumstances
Connected team: Patient · relatives

Questions for an evaluation

Scope the model before deployment.

Define the clinical task, available hardware, intended learners and required evidence before deciding which capabilities belong in an institutional evaluation.

01Can multiple clinicians train together?

Mixed human and AI teamwork is part of the design. A synchronized multiplayer experience is planned; the current prototype provides shared-backend foundations rather than a completed multi-user product.

02Can hospitals create custom scenarios?

Educator authoring is planned for patients, conditions, objectives, teams, complications and rubrics. It is intended to reduce reliance on Unreal source changes, but a production authoring interface is not yet available.

03Can AESORYX run privately or on-premises?

Local inference is used in the current prototype. Private cloud and on-premises delivery are deployment directions to assess with institutions; a production deployment package has not been established.

04Is AESORYX clinically validated or a medical device?

No clinical validation, regulatory approval or clinical decision-support status is claimed. The current work is a simulation prototype. Clinical judgment, patient care and regulated device use require separate governance and evidence.

For institutions building what comes next

Build the next generation
of medical simulation.

Start with your specialty, your team and a concrete learning or research objective.

Request a demo Contact AESORYX